FORWARD DEPLOYED AGENTS
Cloud operations,
from evidence to action.
OPERATIONAL FOCUS
Three priorities. One operating model.
FDAI connects the evidence behind a change, a reliability concern, or a cost signal with a governed next step.
Understand a change before it runs.
Review proposed changes against policy, impact scope, and rollback readiness. Keep the decision and its evidence together.
Explore change safety ResilienceMake recovery a practiced capability.
Connect incidents with their dependencies and evidence. Use bounded recovery actions and drills to assess readiness.
Explore resilience Cost GovernanceGive every cost decision context.
Investigate cost anomalies and right-sizing opportunities. Review the evidence before an eligible change is allowed to run.
Explore cost governanceAvailable actions depend on connected evidence, configured policies, and each action's promotion state.
HOW IT WORKS
Rules before reasoning. Evidence before action.
One operating loop keeps context, decision, and outcome connected. A language model is a tool for ambiguity, not a source of permission.
-
Evidence
Signals grounded in scope, dependencies, time, and provenance.
-
Decision
Rules and patterns first. Residual reasoning needs cross-checks and a verifier.
-
Authorized action
Policy, safeguards, and applicable approval.
-
Verified outcome
An independent observation, recorded in the audit trail.
Conceptual flow, not live activity.
AUTONOMY WITH ACCOUNTABILITY
Start by observing. Expand with evidence.
New actions begin in observation mode. They record proposed decisions without changing resources; promotion is a separate, evidence-based decision.
Human authority stays explicit
Changes require current approval or valid standing human authorization where applicable. Silence is never approval, and approval and executor identities stay separate.
Responsibilities stay distinct
Fifteen specialized agents own observation, judgment, approval delivery, execution, and audit. No agent can approve its own work.
Uncertainty stays visible
Insufficient evidence leads to a hold, denial, recovery, or human review with an audit record. Deployment alone never grants permission to act.
Seven safeguards before an autonomous change
Missing any one blocks execution. Approval and independent effect verification remain separate requirements.
- A clear stop conditionKnow when to halt instead of continuing.
- A tested rollbackKeep a rehearsed recovery path.
- An impact-scope limitBound the resources a change can affect.
- A successful dry-runCheck the proposed effect before applying it.
- A logical-target lockPrevent conflicting changes to the same target.
- A stable idempotency keyMake retries safe without duplicate effects.
- A two-phase auditRecord intent before action and its terminal result.
YOUR NEXT STEP
Begin with one well-defined scope.
An accountable owner, reliable evidence, and a baseline come before broader automation. Choose the guide that fits where you are.
Azure is the implemented target. Results depend on your scope and measured evidence; no performance improvement is assumed.